I hate the phrase “act of God.”
In legal usage throughout the English–speaking world, an act of God is a natural disaster outside human control, such as an earthquake, hurricane, flood or tsunami, for which no person can be held responsible.
As a pastor, I have always found it interesting that the only time God ever makes it into the parlance of the secular world is when a catastrophe occurs, and God is the one who is causing bad things to happen.
I don’t believe God is the one who causes destruction and chaos. I believe in a God who is the healer of all ills, not the one originator of them.
Believing that these kinds of natural disasters are “acts of God” paints a picture of a God who is throwing darts at a dartboard, randomly picking out certain people and areas to “hit” with tragedy.
The God I serve is the one who brought order to the world and who provides solid ground when the earth around me shakes, not the one who sets the earth shaking. God put the world on its course, and allows for a natural order of things.
Bad things happen in the natural world. But not because God is at the helm, pointing the wind to go here and the waves to crest there. Those just follow the laws of nature that God set in motion.
People have a tendency to blame God for anything bad. Whenever there is an illness or a person faces a great struggle, it is not uncommon to hear “God doesn’t give you more than you can handle.”
Why is God the one giving us the struggles? When I hear people say that, I can understand why more and more people are fleeing religious faith. I mean, who wants to be a part of a system where God is handing you every trial and challenge.
I prefer to think that “God gives us the strength to handle what the world gives us.” We live in a broken world. And one of the consequences of that brokenness is that unfair things happen.
We are subject both to our free will — and consequences of our action — and the free will of others. For example, if I drink and drive and something happens, it is my action, my free will, that cause it. If someone else drives drunk and hits a person — the person hit has suffered because of the free will of another person who drank and drove. God had nothing to do with either action.
God is the one who gives a person the strength to deal with the pain of those actions, the consquences of free will. And it is God in Christ, through the power of the resurrection, who gives life, and not death, the last word in the face of the brokenness of the world.
The victory of eternal life that Christ provides in the face of a world where death is inevitable is an act of God. Freedom from eternal death — that is the ultimate act of God.
But there is another reason I have come to loathe the phrase “act of God.” And that is because it denies any human agency in the most recent acts of destruction.
In the last three years, there have been three “500 -year floods” in Houston. I don’t think that this is happening because God has it in for Houston. I think there are far more human reasons it is happening.
In the Bible story about Noah, God destroys the world in a flood, saving only Noah and his family, and a bunch of their animal friends brought on board in pairs, because humans were so sinful and awful that they lost favor with God. The story ends with God saying that this will never happen again. Basically, it is a story whose purpose is to tell us that natural destruction in the world is NOT an act of God.
But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t natural consequences for human behavior. The recent near apocalyptic floods not only in Houston, but in India and Sierra Leone, are the result of the human sin of greed, that happens when there aren’t constraints on oil companies or the use of fossil fuels.
Climate change is the result of human action and the refusal to address it because of the focus on the profit margins of oil and coal companies has led to very real conseqences. The climate has changed, the waters in the ocean are warming, polar ice caps are melting and the weather patterns are changing. This leads to 500-year floods becoming yearly events.
These floods are not “acts of God.” They are the consequences of the acts of humans. Sadly, however, the victims of the floods are rarely the ones ones who are reaping the benefits of unchecked energy companies.
Instead, they are the people on the tiny Pacific Island countries like Kiribati whose homes are being swallowed up in the ocean; they are the slum dwellers in Sierra Leone who have no protection when unprecedented rains cause mudslides; they are the people of Houston who didn’t have enough money to flee the city when the alarm went up and were caught when the torrents came down.
So it is incumbant upon us to not blame God and instead focus our energy on human acts. The Trump administration’s rollback on controlling anything having to do with climate change has far-reaching effects for our entire civilization and as a result we have a call to action.
We need to lift our voice in more than prayers for those who are victims but also in advocacy for those who will be the next victims as we deal with the effects of destruction that humans have a hand in causing.
Floods are not an “act of God.” But if we speak up about the need to address climate change in real and consequential ways, stand up for those who are fighting for regulations to protect our land and water and change our own patterns of behavior to help preserve this world, we will be doing acts for God to protect the world God made.
One thought on “PAULA MEHMEL: Shoot the Rapids — Blame Humans, Not God”
Stanford Edwards September 2, 2017 at 12:21 pm
Well said!!! A superb examination of the phrase “act of God” that invariably is invoked in referring to disasters such as the current one that has befallen the people in Texas and Louisiana who are experiencing the annihilation of the lives they have built for themselves.
At the same time, you have “laid all the cards on the table” in explaining some of the circumstances and human decisions that are leading to the increasing frequency and severity of these catastrophic storms. No one can deny the amazing technological advances and material comforts that the oil industry has provided for all of us in today’s world. At the same time, the evidence continues to mount that these wonderful benefits that we all enjoy and now take for granted are being sustained by detrimental effects to the natural environment of our planet.
This realization was part of the reason for my determined (and still ongoing) opposition to the Dakota Access oil pipeline that was forced through some of Standing Rock’s treaty lands and under the Missouri River/Lake Oahe despite opposition expressed from literally around the world and continual alerts as to the possibility of damaging environmental consequences that could result. As I noted before, the state of North Dakota’s budget is heavily dependent upon oil tax revenue and ND was determined that the project, to benefit the profits of a Texas-based company, be completed whatever the cost so the oil could begin flowing. So the state and its corporate partner clearly demonstrated their power to brutalize and demonize the Water Protectors who gathered here on Standing Rock to oppose the project. However, I believe history will be the judge of the fossil fuels industry and its infrastructure projects.
Reply